![]()
![]()
Project
Team Proposal
Specification
Support
UOM Standard
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Proposed
Project Team / Study Name
5. Anticipated
Completion Date
6. Sponsoring
Member /Work Group/ Sub-Committee
Project Name: UOM Standard
The purpose of this project
is to determine which of two UOM standards should be endorsed as the official
PIDX standard: UN/ECE or ANSI. Currently, PIDX endorses both standards but
as we move forward with both transactions and catalogs, it will become
increasingly important to comply with a single standard.
This initiative is being
undertaken with the goal of increasing adoption of PIDX standards for
transactions and reducing complexity of catalog implementations as we expect
electronic catalogs to figure more prominently in the procure-to-payment
process. Competing standards add
complexity and ambiguity to implementations.
|
Document name |
Type of Document |
Document Source |
|
ANSI_UOM_V0355_004010 |
Excel |
Rec’d from Vendor (via OFS Portal) |
|
UN/ECE rec20 |
Excel |
United Nations - website |
|
CIDX/RAPID Analysis of Issue |
Word |
Jim Wilson - CIDX |
[Please identify the resources that the project team
desires from PIDX staff (do not fill in sections that the project team plans to
perform on its own). Upon receipt of the
completed form, the respective PIDX work group or SIG will review resources
requested and make a recommendation to the Executive Committee as to what
resources can be accommodated.]
|
Minute taking – support (as available) |
X |
|
Facilitation |
|
|
Subject matter expertise |
X |
[Fill-in the
anticipated time commitments of each of the activities in the table below. The
specification manager should help with these time estimates.]
|
Planned activity |
Number per month |
Number of months |
Duration (hrs) |
TPIDXl Time (hrs) |
|
Conference calls |
As needed |
6 |
1 |
|
|
Face to face meetings |
Quarterly |
6 |
3 |
|
[To be completed
by PIDX staff.]
|
Total PIDX staff time required for this project. |
|
|
Project Completion date |
Recommendation: Fall 2006 |
This specification has been submitted by Jana Schey on
behalf of the Business Process Work Group/Sub-Committee. Based on discussions with Sophy Liu,
Halliburton.
Contact
Information:
Name: Jana Schey
Company: OFS Portal
Mailing Address:
Telephone: 832-681-7319
Fax #: 832-681-7396
E-Mail Address: jschey@ofs-portal.com
The chair of this Work Group/ Sub-Committee has
reviewed this submission for completeness and understands this particular Work
Group/ Sub-Committee is the Sponsoring Work Group/ SIG, responsible for the
communication process. This does not
mean the Chair or Work Group/ SIG is approving the actual work or its inclusion
in any specification.
_Jana
Chair’s Signature or Initials
(electronic is acceptable)
The following PIDX
members/companies are participants in the development of these specifications:
|
Member |
Company |
E-Mail Address |
|
Jana Schey |
OFS Portal |
|
|
|
Baker Hughes |
|
|
Dean Bilden/ |
BJ Services |
|
|
Sophy Liu |
Halliburton |
|
|
|
Schlumberger |
|
|
Rich Gould |
Chevron |
|
|
John Soul/Dave
Petty |
Cameron |
|
|
|
M-I Swaco |
|
|
Tim Hainey |
Transport4 |
|
Mail distribution list required? |
YES – wider
distribution than listed above |
|
Please provide the name of the mail distribution list: |
bpwg@listserve.api.org |
|
Component |
Status |
Estimated Completion Date |
|
UNECE v. ANSI
gap analysis |
Complete |
3/27/2006 |
|
Individual
company analyses |
In progress |
6/2006 |
|
Recommendation
to PIDX |
For discussion
6/8 |
Fall 2006
General Session |
|
List of UOMs
needed for industry |
For discussion |
Fall 2006
General Session |
|
UOM requests to
appropriate standards bodies |
Not started |
TBD – prefer
12/31/06 |